Charles Nolan
  • Home
  • About
  • Non Fiction
    • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Poetry
    • Prayer (Chapbook Selections)
    • Selections from "Before There Was Language"
    • Monk in a Storm
    • The Wild Party
    • Pig
    • Runaway Slave
  • Songwriting
    • Song Lyrics
  • Contact

When the Movie Stops, Part 2

10/31/2013

0 Comments

 
Boy, do I hate to be right.

When I ended my blog about the symbolic underpinnings of last week’s heartbreaking Nevada school shooting with the words “more to come”, I had no idea how soon “more” would turn out to be. As it turned out, the day after the Nevada shootings, a California policeman shot a teenager to death because the boy was carrying a toy gun.

While this second tragedy doesn’t seem to meet the usual standards for a “copycat” killing, the link between the two events is hard to miss. Let me spell it out. Repeated media coverage of teenagers shooting up their own schools has altered the “symbolic arsenal” of police officers. Whereas in an earlier time a child with a gun would have been treated with more restraint than a similarly armed adult, this is no longer true. The benefit of the doubt when it’s “only a kid” is gone. Just the opposite - the California police may well have reacted with deadly force out of fear that the young man in front of them was on his way to carry out his own “copycat” of the Nevada shooting.

There’s a lot going on here, but it’s not complicated. Like I said before, it’s all about bad symbolism. The depressed boy sees killing his schoolmates as a way to deal with his depression, the terrorist sees blowing up buildings full of people he doesn’t know as a way of solving his own sense of purposelessness and the policeman sees shooting a child in the street as a way of saving other children, not to mention himself – the Nevada child fatally shot a teacher who tried to talk him down and now that’s part of the California cop’s symbolic arsenal too. All territory is becoming enemy territory – and he who hesitates dies. That’s a hard symbol to shake.

But there’s another layer of bad symbolism going on here as well. The on-line coverage included a picture of the gun the boy was holding. It wasn’t a water pistol. It was an assault rifle. It looked like an assault rifle - adult size, polished wood, dark metal, sites in place –primed and ready to go– just aim, squeeze and spray. Not a gun anybody would mess with. Tax-paying companies that employ church-going people are making these toys and parents are buying them for their children. Those children are playing video games where the objective is to kill enemies in the high three figures (or four plus on the advanced levels). The symbols are driving the market and the fear is driving the symbols. And when the movie stops a couple of sick to their stomachs cops are standing over a kid’s body on the sidewalk a couple of blocks from his house, where his video game player is probably still plugged in.

The oldest rule of war is that it’s easier to kill a hundred people than it is to kill one. The more the enemy becomes a symbol the less he is someone with a mother like yours and the easier he is to send home to his mother in a bag. The problem is, on a flat screen TV everybody’s a symbol.

The genie’s out of the bottle - time can’t go backwards. We can’t not hear about these things. If it’s not on the news it will be on Facebook. We’re not going back to flintlock rifles and there’s no market for cap guns - though there probably will be for bullet proof vests in children’s sizes very soon, if there isn’t already. So what can we do?

First, we can stop wasting our time asking “why?”. We know why. Our primal urges (fear, self-protection, rage –that sort of thing) have been given a lot of new ways to express themselves by our technology and things have gotten out of hand. It’s not the technology’s fault. It got us out of the caves. We just didn’t come all the way with it. We need to stop forgetting that. Whether it’s weapons technology or communications technology doesn’t make much difference – they’re both tools in human hands. And from the beginning of the human experience, our tools have been more than just tools – they’ve been the symbols we use to deal with our reality, our emotional protection from a world we didn’t make. My club is not just a stick, it’s my sense of power. An assault rifle is only a better club. My enemy, real or imagined, is a symbol of everything I’m afraid of. Whether I get my information about who my enemy is from my tribal chief, CNN or my PlayStation,  I’ll react the same way when I see him coming, even if he’s a thirteen year old boy.

When war becomes game, human beings win, and live to play again. When game becomes war, human beings lose, and die before their time. Telling the difference is getting harder.

None of us are immune. Ask any cop in the country, what he would give to have encountered the Newtown shooter walking down the street with a visible firearm in his hands five minutes before the killer entered the Sandy Hook school. And if you follow that up with the question, “And what would you have done if you had?” you will only get one answer – “Shoot the bastard dead” - from every cop you ask. I know that’s the answer they’d give because it’s the same answer I’d give.

We have a lot of work to do.

0 Comments

"School Shooting" - When the Movie Stops

10/22/2013

0 Comments

 
One of the saddest and clearest indications of the existence of the “big black hole we all need to fill” in contemporary life is the fact that the term “school shooting” exists at all. In the post-Columbine era, we all know exactly what it means. Our first reaction on hearing it is always the same: “Oh no, not again.” The definition of the term keeps expanding as the number of incidents mount up: at this point it can be any grade from kindergarten through college, the shooter or shooters can be anyone from a kid in your daughter’s class to a person from the outside with no obvious connection to the school. The common factor is the location (school), the targets (children and teachers) and the fact that people die.

What “school shooting” incidents also have in common is being a subset in a larger category we could call “acts of violence against random persons, usually resulting in multiple fatalities, frequently (but not always) resulting in the death of the perpetrator or perpetrators”. This larger group includes the growing number of attacks in shopping center parking lots, movie theaters, restaurants, public events like the Boston Marathon and even on military bases, where you’d think they’d be ready for it.

They aren’t. None of us are. We can’t hide all the guns and we can’t build walls high enough. Half the time, the killers are already inside. The other half they walk in like ordinary citizens – because they are ordinary citizens. The sad fact is we can’t protect us from us.

If I come off sounding a bit technical, it’s because we need to be. We need to understand what we’re dealing with. In all these events, questions of “who” and “how” tend to get answered in the first twenty four hours, a few days longer if it takes some time to run down the killers – but they get answered. “Why?” doesn’t get answered and keeps coming back for more.

As I spent a lot of time going over in “The Holy Bluff”, “Why?” is different from other questions. “Why?” can’t be answered by “just the facts”. “Why?” isn’t about the facts. It’s about the reasons behind the facts. And on this planet, only a human being can answer this particular question, since we’re the only ones who have individually created reasons for the things we do. If a wolf attacked a school child, no one would ask it why. They’d just shoot it and give out more hunting licenses. It’s not that easy with human beings, especially those who kill other human beings for no apparent reason. Frequently the answers die with the killers. The sad fact, though, is that we don’t get much better answers from the killers who survive to come to trial – a lot of background and speculation, reports from doctors, but no clear statements that make a whole lot of sense to anybody but the killers, if even to them.

It’s time to take the gloves off. We know what’s going on. It’s been going on for as long as there have been human beings. The only difference is that the weapons are better and now it’s on television, which makes a big difference – because what we’re talking about here is symbolism, plain and simple – symbolism gone wrong – and in our world mass media is the language of our symbols, both external and internal.

Let’s take a look at another subset of our larger group – the terrorist attack. Take away the political/religious underpinnings and it’s no different from a school shooting. A lot of people with no personal responsibility for a problem end up paying for it because they happen to be in the wrong symbolic place at the wrong real time. The terrorist and the depressed teenager have more in common than might meet the eye. Both are looking for symbols to make sense of their lives. Finding no positive symbols that keep the darkness at bay, they turn to negative symbols.

What mass media has to do with it is in some ways obvious. The amount of information constantly coming at us about random acts of violence has had the unavoidable effect of increasing the “symbolic arsenal” available to the depressed person or the potential fanatic. What’s not so obvious is that Newspaper coverage of Lindberg’s flight across the Atlantic had the same effect on the general public’s arsenal of potential transportation options. Something that had not been heard of before was now possible. 9/11 presupposed the Wright brothers. Today’s school shooting presupposed the Alamo. One symbol leads to another. Positive and negative get mixed up in the symbolic soup, the movie ends - and the shooting begins.

Perhaps the most chilling part of today’s coverage from Nevada was the line “he didn't seem like the school shooter type” at the top of one of the press releases. We expect the killer to look a certain way, to have certain predictable problems – broken home, history of mental illness, difficulties at school or in the community. We need to remember that we all fit the profile. We all need positive symbols to keep going. Life is more like a movie than we imagine. We need to pay better attention to the script, for everybody’s sake.

More to come.

0 Comments

Narcissus Gets a Life

10/18/2013

0 Comments

 
The warnings contained in the myth of Narcissus have largely been ignored by the many generations who have come and gone since they were first spelled out. Like all tales that hold deep truths, the story is simple: Narcissus, an attractive young man, spurns the attentions of the nymph Echo, feeling he is too good for her. Echo becomes depressed by his rejection and fades away until she becomes only (you guessed it) an echo. Nemesis, the goddess of revenge (a goddess you really don’t want to mess with), is angered by his arrogance and condemns Narcissus to fall in love with his own reflection in a pool of water. Narcissus, unable to reach the object of his affection, pines away and dies. Talk about frustration on all sides.

          The obvious question: if an ancient Greek motivational speaker had come upon Narcissus mooning over his pool, picked him up by the shoulders, given him a good shaking and said “Get over yourself!”, would it have helped? Based on the continuing prosperity of cosmetics companies, hair care product manufacturers and plastic surgeons, the answer is a resounding “probably not much.” If anything, narcissism, the personality trait (or in its extreme forms, psychiatric diagnosis) to which our hero has given his name, is on the rise, especially in western cultures. An obsession with ourselves seems to be hard-wired into the human animal. Let’s take a closer look.

          On one side, having positive feelings about ourselves is a good thing. Evolution, both for groups and individuals, favors those who consider their own survival important to the general welfare of planet. Those who consider themselves unworthy to live don’t live long. But that’s just the surface of the story.

          If you look at it a little more closely, Narcissus and Echo have the same problem. Narcissus isn’t in love with himself. He’s in love with his image. He can reach himself any time he wants. He’s already there. But every time he tries to touch the beautiful image he thinks he loves, it turns into water ripples and vanishes. Echo on the other hand pines away because the image of herself she’s looking for is her image in Narcissus’ eyes – and he deems her unworthy – unworthy of his love - unworthy to live. He’s her pool. We all have one. Our notion of ourselves is a projected image – maintaining a balance between accuracy and inaccuracy is tricky, and other people’s agreement or disagreement with the image we’re hanging onto can shake things up considerably. In order to keep up appearances for our audience, and even more for ourselves, we’ll go to great expense and occasional extremes (plastic surgery gone bad suggests that the goddess Nemesis is as active as she ever was). So what’s going on here?

          The trouble with loving ourselves too much is that we’re hitching our wagon to a star that’s bound to burn out. Idealized images are perfect and forever. We’re neither. That’s a problem for us. It’s hard to love our digestive systems, our urinary tracts and our hangnails, not to mention our arthritis, lost hair and declining eyesight. We need a little smoke and mirrors up there on the big screen just to keep going.  Vanity is good. But when we lose all connection to the blood, guts and mud we came from, we can get seduced by the image, forget who we really are, lean over too far and drown in the pool.

          Where narcissism crosses the line is when we start seeing not only ourselves, but everybody and everything out there as nothing but parts of our own projection. The long standing human belief that the earth was the center of the universe only reflects the inner sense of every human born that “I”, me eternal, am the center of the universe, that the world only exists so I can have someplace to stand and that other people only exist so they can have the supreme pleasure of seeing and liking “me”. We all have a touch of it. We need it. What we don’t need is to get so caught up in “us” that we lose our ability to empathize with our fellow humans, other living things and the remorselessly burning out (just like us) chunk of rock we’re all standing on. When we do, we miss a lot. A steady diet of “me, pure me” can get pretty boring. The one we finally lose touch with, when we get too caught up with ourselves is, ironically enough, ourselves.

          The best thing our old motivational speaker could have done for Narcissus would have been to throw a few healthy fistfuls of dirt at him. Once he saw his own image with mud on his face, our boy might have wised up, gone after Echo before she changed her mind and took her out on the town to make amends. And before he took her home, if he was smart, he’d have asked his buddy the motivational speaker to run on ahead and throw out every mirror in the house. Sometimes, you’ve got to play it safe - even if it is a little narcissistic.

0 Comments

The Need for Myth

10/1/2013

0 Comments

 
This is a little piece I came up with a few years ago that, in many ways, started me on the path that wound up turning into “The Holy Bluff”.

 The need for mythology is probably greater at this point than at any other time in recent history. Therapy has failed, self-help has failed, exercise, diet, the acquisition of money, political allegiance, even the old standbys, drugs and booze – all failures.  Religion, the most popular form of “official” myth, has become downright dangerous. We’ve tried just about everything and we still ain’t satisfied. We want answers. The only place we’re likely to find them is in what I like to call “good mythology”.

I’m going on about this because, as far as I’m concerned, my job on this website,  as well as the job of any other writer, singer, poet or storyteller is to be above all a maker of good myths. And what is a good myth? A good myth is a true myth. Not in the sense that “this  thing I’m telling you about
actually happened”. Far from it - myth, by definition, is at closest a reworking of some actual event to enhance its significance. Myth doesn’t need a historical event to be valid. The truest myths, in fact, are those that are unencumbered by being confused with actual events - hence the more dangerous elements in religion as noted above - when the holy grail got mixed up with whatever cup was put in front of “historical Jesus” at his last Seder, people started questing for it and sacking each other’s cities over it – we’re still paying for it. 

Good mythology has its basis in our dreams, our brain’s unconscious mechanism for sorting things out while we sleep – pre-verbal, pre-writing, pre-having to believe it because they tell you to. The song, the story, the poem, the play, the prayer and even the Hollywood blockbuster are our attempts to bring the process to light where everybody (including us) can see it. 
 
And why exactly do we need to do all this? The reason, which shouldn’t surprise anybody, is that human life simply doesn’t work. We’re born screwed. We want the wrong things, we love the wrong things, we chase the wrong things, and no matter how hard we try or how well we do, we’re gonna get picked off anyway – the pink slips are already in the mail - mine, yours, the President’s, everybody’s. Bad mythology denies, avoids or tries to bargain this away. Good  mythology faces it head on and deals with it.

Finally,  it all comes down to the blues.

If your baby takes your money and buys a present for her new boyfriend, you’ve only got three choices:
  • Do something really bad to her and spend the rest of your days in jail.
  • Start drinking heavily and drop the rest of your natural life in a rusty can, or
  • Put it in a song and consider the royalties sweet revenge on her, on yourself, on everything - the whole damn package.

    The blues is myth in its purest form, stripped to the essentials. Beethoven is the blues with extra instruments.

    We can’t get even with the universe for doing this to us. The universe doesn’t care. The simple fact is that the universe is a blind, uninterested mass of stuff racing around following rules it doesn’t even know about. We’re the only ones  who know what we’re doing, much as we try not to. We’re the only ones who get to tell the story and we’re the only ones  listening.

     So we might as well sing.

0 Comments

Secularism and the "Standing Man"

10/1/2013

0 Comments

 
I believe it’s important to take note of the impact and deeper ramifications for Secularism of the silent protest of Erdem Gunduz, the “Standing Man” of Taskim Square in Istanbul. His protest was
symbolic. He just stood there. He didn’t carry a sign, he didn’t throw rocks, he  didn’t offer arguments pro or con about the appropriateness of constructing a  shopping mall on the site of the last park in Istanbul. He just stood there.  Word of his protest, and more importantly, his picture quickly spread and hundreds of his countrymen were inspired to join him. No religious issues are overtly at stake in this face down between Turkish citizens and their government, a government which represents a ground-breaking success for secularism in a part of the world where this is far from the norm. What is at stake, and what the success of Mr. Gunduz’ protest demonstrates is the importance of symbolism to human beings. The park at risk of being bulldozed has a symbolic meaning for the citizens of Istanbul, a meaning which brought them to
Taskim Square in such large (and loud) numbers that their own government found it necessary to tear gas them. The response to the government’s subsequent ban on group assemblies is the standing man – a living symbol of the rights of the individual against the power of police, guns, tear gas and economic policy. The symbol evoked a response no argument could have.
 
Secularism is a work in progress. We humans are new to operating without transcendent imagery, divine or otherwise. The fact is, we can’t and we shouldn’t. We need new symbols, better symbols – trying to manage with no symbols isn’t who we are. Our need for symbolism to help us cope with our confusing world led to the development of formal religion, and will survive it. Whether the standing man is Erdem Gunduz or Jesus Christ, it’s the symbol that speaks to us, not the politics or the dogma.  In the secular world, we going to need all the symbols we can get. It looks like we just got one. Thank you, Erdem.

 
Posted
on the  Global Secular Humanist
Website 6/20/13.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/18/turkey-standing-man-protest-erdem-gunduz_n_3458390.html

0 Comments

Poetry and Why It Matters

10/1/2013

0 Comments

 
Anyone who thinks of poetry as something for timid little people with their heads in the clouds hasn’t been reading the good stuff. The problem with the poetry we’re taught in school is that it gets taught in school. They make you memorize it or answer questions about it, questions that are supposed to have right or wrong answers. I remember getting in trouble once in English class for reading Dylan Thomas’ poem about a child killed in the World War II London bombing with so much emotion that I missed the line breaks. The poem was an exercise in controlled fury. Dylan Thomas wouldn’t have given a damn about the line breaks. He’d have probably bought me a drink. Poetry has no right answers - though in some ways it’s the best answer we’ve got, maybe the only answer we’ve got.

Poetry is how we make sense of our lives. Poetry in books is the least of it. Every move we make, every word we say, is a poem in its own right. The closer what gets written down comes to reflecting what we actually do with our lives, the better it is. Life doesn’t rhyme. Pretty little poems about trees are only worth reading if you’re willing to die for the tree.

A poem is a tool, a map, and in the right hands, a weapon. Think of Sylvia Plath hurling poems in the face of her oncoming suicide like a child throwing rocks at a charging Tyrannosaurus Rex. Think of Milton’s Lucifer, choosing hell over heaven, inventing the bad attitude for all time.  Think of Bukowski’s “Small Talk”, where a man who knows he’s only got a few years to live sits down for a friendly chat with death and winds up feeling sorry for the poor bastard. And then there’s the poetry that happens all the time, that gets said once and doesn’t need to get written down. 

Like that time in Queens a few minutes after sundown when everybody was scurrying around for last minute supplies because the weather report said a giant winter storm was on its way. Just as I got to the corner with my bag of groceries the wind carried in a long, smooth stream of
crystallized confetti, gleaming in the streetlights like weightless diamonds.  Everybody stopped dead in their tracks and looked up at it. Across the corner  from me, this big guy in a hooded sweatshirt, Queens incarnate, raised both his beefy hands to the sky and intoned, in a voice loud and clear enough to put the weather gods on notice, with just a touch of the kind of humor that makes defiance unnecessary, “Here it comes!” 

Now that’s poetry. That’s what Shakespeare was trying for, and occasionally hit, when he got lucky. And the guy on the corner had much better props. Poetry is us putting the weather gods, the time gods, the hunger gods and even their big brother the death god on notice that we’re not gonna take this shit quietly - that we’re ready for it, that they can keep it coming, that we’d miss it if they didn’t, that we can take the mess we’ve been handed and turn it into something beautiful. They’ve got the cancer, we’ve got the words. They may or may not be enough – every one of us is a jury of one on that one. The point is, no matter what the gods throw at us, they’re not gonna shut us up. Only we can do that.

When we stop talking, when we stop drawing, when we stop writing this stuff down for other people to see, when we stop singing, in short, when we stop creating, we start destroying. We drop bombs on each other thinking that’s going to get the  gods’ attention. It does, and they’re laughing at us. The storm didn’t laugh at that guy on the corner in Queens. In fact, I thought I saw a snowflake tip its hat. And Dylan Thomas wasn’t laughing when he stood over that child’s grave with his hat in his hands. And then he went home, put down his hat and picked up his pen. He didn’t go out and try to bomb the other guys. If they’d asked him, there wouldn’t have been a war in the first place – a fistfight in a bar maybe, but no war. War is poetry gone wrong. We need as much of the good stuff as we can get.

And that’s why poetry matters. 


 
Readers are urged to check out the good stuff: 

A Refusal the Mourn the Death, by Fire, of a Child in London - Dylan Thomas

The Ariel Poems- Sylvia Plath

Paradise Lost - John Milton (forget what your English teacher said about it,  it’s a hell of a story)

 
Small Talk (the one from "The Pleasures of  the Damned") - Charles Bukowski


 
0 Comments

Age Before Beauty - Tithonus on Medicare

10/1/2013

0 Comments

 
Perhaps none of the ancient myths has come true with more of a vengeance than the story of Tithonus, the mortal whom the gods granted eternal life but neglected to give eternal youth. In the original tale, Tithonus was loved by Eos, the goddess of the dawn, who asked Jove, the king of the gods, to grant her lover immortality so she could have him with her forever. In a classic example of the “other side of the coin” phenomena that seems to occur in most if not all human dealings with the gods, she neglected to ask Jove to give him eternal youth, and her poor lover went on living forever, but wasted away both physically and mentally. The story ends with Eos shutting Tithonus away behind “shining doors” so as not to see his decayed features or hear his endless babbling. 

Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s well known poem on the theme portrays Tithonus as having asked the gods for immortality himself, and as pleading with Eos to take it back, allowing him to rejoin the brotherhood of “happy men who have the power to die” – the ultimate example of “be careful what you wish for.”

In our day, the ability to medically sustain life past a person’s ability to participate in or enjoy it, as well as the heartbreaking ravages of Alzheimer’s disease, echo the myth with chilling resonance. Like Tithonus, our yearnings for immortality have inspired us, with considerable success, to devise means to extend our lives. The unnamed poet who first created the Tithonus story would  have been considered to have reached a ripe old age if he had managed to pull fifty years out of nature’s capricious hands. Modern medicine suggests that my grandchildren may consider themselves cheated if they don’t make it to a hundred. The flip side of the modern coin is of course no more attractive than it was for Tithonus. The thought of a slow, humiliating death drawn out over years of diminished capacity and awareness is not an attractive prospect - no doubt contributing to the success of the hang gliding and sky diving industries. Given a choice, most of us would rather die on our feet.

The difference between us and Tithonus is that the gods didn’t do this to us - we did. 

The myth invokes the god’s customary dirty trick: there’s no going back to the  drawing board, no opportunity to correct for oversights at the planning stage. This myth, as do they all, reflects life’s dirty trick – one year, a hundred or a thousand, sooner or later we’re outa here and there’s no correcting it, not then, not now not ever. We can try to bargain with the gods, but they hold the
upper hand –and once the gods have spoken, that’s it. Eos couldn’t make a follow up phone call to Jove and expect to find Tithonus’ eternal youth coupon in the  next day’s Fed Ex from the Capitoline Hill.  

She couldn’t - but we can. 

We do it all the time. We can’t fix the big picture, but in the meantime we’re very good at picking off the little ones. We learn from our mistakes. The most valuable word in the human vocabulary is “oops!”.

The entire history of mankind’s attempts to defy our mortality by “fixing” things,  not to mention the process by which this planet and everything on it, living or otherwise, has come into being is a result of our access to a resource beyond the god’s capacities: trial and error. Divine entities, by virtue of being abstract and “complete”, are stuck with what they’ve got. We’re not. We’ll crack
this Alzheimer’s thing – people are working on it right now, a lot of people, smart people, with money and resources behind them. The first one to crack it will make a fortune, and you know how that motivates humans. And while we’re at it, we’ll find ways of having supple joints and health in general last as long as we do. It’s what we do. We’re good at it. It may take a while, but we’ve got all the time in the world. We just got here. The fact that survival without health annoys us puts a target on its chest that the human race has never missed. 

We’re still stuck with the big picture – mortal is mortal – and with the little  picture - “Sure they’ll fix it someday, but what about me ?”
[1] – as well as with several intermediate pictures – medical advances are expensive and are never available to everybody, for instance.   But that’s the game we’re in - this life thing we’re so fond of. It’s a  moving target, on ongoing process, trial and error. 
 
In the contemporary version, Tithonus goes on Medicare, gets put on a macro-biotic diet, is assigned a personal trainer and goes to the top of the list for trials of the next big breakthrough in brain cell rejuvenation medication. Talk about  availability for long-term study. Eos will get rich just renting him out - as  long as she remembered to get those power of attorney forms signed while he still had his marbles.  Hopefully, she learned from her first mistake. There may be hope, even for the gods.

None of it will change the game. The more we fix, the more we know what we can’t fix. When the time comes, we’ll still have to show our pair of twos against the  house’s royal flush. The trick, as ever, will be to keep our dignity and our sense of humor when they take away our few last remaining chips and throw us out in the street.







[1]This example is particularly personal for the author. My
father’s older brother died of an infection from an insect bite just a few
months before the development of penicillin.

0 Comments

The Problem with Icarus

10/1/2013

0 Comments

 
We  all know the story of Icarus. In the Greek myth, Icarus and his father Daedulus  were trying to escape from the island of Crete by flying over the sea on wings made of feathers. The feathers were held together by beeswax, and the contraptions were worn on their backs, giving them in artist’s depictions the  appearance commonly attributed to angels in later western culture. The wings in this case were strapped to their arms, in imitation of bird  flight, an enterprise that would occupy a lot of subsequent human time and  energy until the Wright brothers got it right. 
           
Back to our story - before they took off on their flight, Daedulus, who  had constructed the wings, warned his son not to fly too close to the sun or too  close to the sea, the logic being that the sun’s heat would melt the beeswax  and the greater humidity down by the sea would weigh the wings down – sound advice as it turned out.  In the  story, they both got successfully aloft and were making their escape over the water.  Icarus, however, got  carried away with his new-found ability and flew too close to the sun. As had  been predicted, the wax melted, the wings fell apart, and he fell into the sea and was killed. The message of the story usually goes along the lines of: “Don’t strive too high or glory in your own achievement or your foolish pride will  strike you down.”  The more  religious types pick up on the angel resemblance and spell it out in big  letters: “Don’t go trying to act like you're you know who, or he’ll smack you down and put you in your place.”  
           
But wait…
           
In the original story, Icarus didn’t make the wings. His father did.  Daedulus is described as a “master craftsman”, a guy with skills who worked hard at what he did.  He not only made the wings, but was very aware of their limitations. While Icarus got carried  away with himself, soaring around yelling “I can fly, I can fly” as if he had  anything to do with it, Daedulus stayed on course – not too high, not too low – and made good his escape, with, I suspect, some spectacular views of the sea and Greek Islands as he went. If poor Icarus hadn’t given the wings a really bad  image problem with his famous fall, Daedulus could have made a fortune franchising them, not to mention opening the first flying school in Athens. The King who had imprisoned them in the first place would have probably given him a  full pardon in return for a custom made pair and a couple of free lessons. 
           
That being said, the real lesson of the story is “Before you use a new device, be sure to read the instruction manual.” Or, to dig a little deeper,  “You can achieve a lot of things other people might think are impossible, if you understand what you’re up against and work within the limitations.” Advice the Wright Brothers took to heart, with considerable success. Not that progress is  ever risk free – one of the Wright Brothers’ inspirations, German inventor Otto Lilienthal, achieved great success with gliders in the second half of the 19th century, but died following a crash in one of his inventions.  Be that as it may, due to the contributions of the Otto’s and Orville’s of this world,we can fly. Icarus’ only contribution was in giving the real achievers a bad name. 
           
And that’s the problem with Icarus.


0 Comments

    Author

    Charles Nolan regularly blogs about the ideas expressed in "The Holy Bluff".

    New blogs are added about every few weeks, and previous ones are archived for the interested reader.

    Charles Nolan welcomes comments and questions from readers and can be reached through the Contact page of this website.

    Archives

    April 2023
    December 2020
    September 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    June 2018
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    June 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Belief In God
    Communism
    Pope
    Priest
    Tacloban City
    Typhoon Haiyan

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly